Reach more people
Accessible structure supports customers who use screen readers, keyboards, zoom, captions, and other tools.
An accessibility audit reviews real pages, templates, navigation, forms, and interactive features against WCAG guidance. It combines automated testing with manual checks so the business receives a useful repair plan instead of a misleading pass-or-fail score.
When a visitor cannot read a page, operate a menu, understand an error, or submit a form, the website has excluded a potential customer and interrupted a business process.
Accessible structure supports customers who use screen readers, keyboards, zoom, captions, and other tools.
Clear forms, controls, and feedback help more visitors complete inquiries, purchases, registrations, and account tasks.
Accessible code often produces clearer hierarchy, stronger states, better labels, and more predictable interaction.
A prioritized audit gives the business concrete evidence of known barriers, fixes, and remaining work.
Many barriers are invisible during normal mouse-based testing. A website can look polished and still be difficult or impossible to operate with assistive technology.
The review should cover the pages and actions people actually rely on: service information, navigation, contact, search, checkout, account access, registration, and other core workflows.
Select shared templates, high-traffic pages, forms, and business-critical journeys so the audit reflects the real site.
Use automated tools for coverage, then test keyboard behavior, focus order, structure, instructions, and interactive states manually.
Group repeated template issues, identify blocked tasks, and rank findings by user impact, reach, and repair effort.
Repair code and content, retest affected journeys, and document issues that require design, platform, or third-party changes.
No. ADA.gov notes that a clean automated report does not necessarily mean everything is accessible. Automated checks are useful, but they need to be paired with manual review and testing of real interactions.
No. The audit identifies technical and content barriers using established accessibility guidance. Legal obligations depend on the organization and situation, so legal conclusions should come from qualified counsel.
W3C encourages use of the latest WCAG version. WCAG 2.2 keeps the earlier criteria and adds requirements involving areas such as visible focus, target size, dragging, consistent help, and accessible authentication.
Start with representative pages and the actions customers depend on most, then prioritize barriers that block access or completion.
Share the website, system, issue, or idea. You'll hear directly from the developer doing the work.
A few details are enough to get the conversation started.